Learning Community for Building Food Sovereignty in Chiapas and the Yucatan Peninsula, México
CAN and its network partner El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR) launched a two-year project, CASSA, to create a learning community for the construction of food security and sovereignty in Southern México. CASSA (Comunidad de Aprendizaje para la Seguridad y Soberanía Alimentaria/Learning community for the construction of food security and sovereignty) is funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. The Project aims to form a learning community among 24 local civil society organizations (CSOs) that work to promote food security and sovereignty (FSS) in Chiapas and the Yucatán Peninsula in México and facilitate exchange of knowledge and working tools with the ultimate goal of promoting organizational processes that are participatory, just, and collaborative in the search for food sovereignty. The main output, aside from the community itself, will be a tool kit for like-minded organizations.
The Learning Community
The 40 participants from the 24 CASSA CSOs come from the south-eastern states Chiapas, Yucatán, Campeche, and Quintana Roo. They include an indigenous farmers’ organization that produces 450 tons of chili per annum; maize activists who run annual seed exchange fairs; young people running a healthy lunch restaurant; the Chiapas school gardens network; an NGO supporting a cocoa cooperative and women’s milpas (traditional intercropped fields); a farmers’ market; two universities; various NGOs running rural development projects (two of them with a countrywide scope), and one initiative working steadily for 25 years in the most marginalized community they could find when they started. Many started with a focus on food security such as vegetable gardens and are incorporating agroecology and, in some cases, getting inspired by the more far-reaching message of food sovereignty.
The research institute ECOSUR, is located in San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas. ECOSUR provides expertise in agroecology and participatory research through the involvement of members of its Scaling-Up Agroecology research team (Drs. Helda Morales, Bruce Ferguson and Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho), hosts the local project team, channels funds for spending in Mexico through its rigorous financial management systems, provides project participants with a certificate of further education on completion of the project, and provides the potential for amplifying the best practices identified in the project through its research networks. CASSA project staff are based in San Cristóbal, Chiapas and Hopelchen, Campeche in Mexico, and Santa Cruz, California in the United States.
Community: we strive to create and strengthen relationships among participants at the personal and organizational levels, creating trust and a basis for collaborations in the long term.
Mutual learning: we recognize that there is a wealth of pre-existing expertise within the learning community and we use every opportunity for sharing, mentoring, and “cross-fertilization” of ideas. We encourage visits to each others’ projects and invitations to fellow learning community members as “internal consultants.”
Practicing what you preach: to the extent possible, project events take place in “real world” agroecology centers.
Processes: our aim is to document and strengthen the way in which organizations work, not to produce step-by-step “recipes.”
Relevance: the learning and tool kit have to be useful and context-specific for CSOs working on FSS with communities in the region.
Year 2: writing up, publishing, and disseminating the toolkit.
The project is structured around four “encounters,” or workshops, that bring together the whole learning community and participant-selected thematic groups for focused learning. Concurrently, there is monitoring and evaluation, academic research, and the option to arrange extra learning visits. A large part of the content of the toolkit emerges from these activities.
The focus was on introducing the plans and selecting themes for piloting. The team analyzed and grouped priority topics mentioned in the organizations’ applications, a survey and discussions. The participants selected a thematic group to join. Each group went on to develop a process related to their specific theme (such as, “participation” or “agroecology”). The six thematic groups and their chosen processes are:
- Traditional knowledge: Using video as a tool to transmit traditional knowledge.
- Strengthening social community organizations in the long term: Collating and piloting best practices step by step.
- Participatory, inclusive methods: Training field staff and students on participatory approaches for food sovereignty.
- Mayan Agroecology: Constructing family-level agroecology processes.
- Income generation: Adapting the “CANVAS” tool for processing and marketing produce.
- Alliances: Trust and place-based coordination in FSS alliances.
The thematic groups’ learning and experiences will form chapters of the toolkit.
Between the first and second encounters thematic groups met to develop their chosen process for piloting and analysis. These meetings are called “mini-encounters” and include both planning meetings and implementation of pilot activities.
At the second encounter we met for three days to work on turning visions into plans. The planning work at the Encounter was livened up with activities to strengthen the “community” side of the learning community. The participants finalized their plans for piloting in thematic groups, explored “best failures,” and held a mini-farmers’ market. We had an advice exchange; a safe space for analyzing and learning from our past mistakes; work in the gardens and worm compost of the agroecology center Tsomanotik; indigenous Maya rituals – plus sessions on the monitoring and evaluation framework and research. All of this contributes to unearthing and learning about “best processes” in FSS.
Between August 2016 and March 2017 the participant organizations are piloting their chosen process – that is, implementing it in their work and recording the results both for monitoring, for their own learning, and for the toolkit. At the same time, the project team accompanies and facilitates the groups and conducts additional interviews to gather material for the toolkit.
The third encounter is scheduled to take place in April 2017. During this encounter, participants will evaluate their piloting, opening the discussion to issues beyond the thematic groups’ experiences, and contributing content to the toolkit.
Fourth Encounter (early 2018)
We expect to publish the toolkit towards the end of 2017. After it’s published, we plan to hold a dissemination event involving both participants and other interested parties, focusing on how local CSOs can make use of it in order to improve their work with FSS.
The six themes below were selected in the first Encuentro in May 2016, based on the participant organizations’ membership survey; “what I want to learn” mapping; and “Walking and Talking” exercise. The participants were free to choose which thematic group (TG) they would join. Three identified themes were left without uptake and were never piloted (but will be included as chapters in the final toolkit): women and youth, policy advocacy, and M&E. Some organizations sent their two representatives to different groups but the majority focused on one group.
Each TG developed a process to pilot based on the following criteria: 1) FSS focus, 2) useful for the participant organization and other CSOs working on SSA in the region, 3) to do with a CSO’s work with communities, 4) neither too easy (e.g. a one-off activity) nor an overly complex change process (e.g. values-level work), 5) that they could implement (pilot) in their organizations, each one in a manner appropriate for them, 6) in the time available (August 2016-March 2017).
Each TG has two CASSA team facilitators and a budget for implementing their activities. They track their progress with a monitoring form at two levels: one for the thematic group as a whole, and one for each participant organization. The learning from the TGs will form one of the three parts of the final output, the “Toolkit for good processes in FSS.”
Some TGs pilot one joint activity together, such as the family agroecology meetings of TG Mayan Agroecology where each organization invites two families to the joint events. In others, each participant organization implements the common process in a way appropriate for them, such as GT Local Knowledge where each organization is making a different participatory video.
The results from the pilots will be discussed and analyzed among all CASSA members in the third Encuentro, to be held in late April 2017.
- Alliances: Strengthening trust and location-based cooperation in SSA alliances.
- Mayan Agroecology: Family-based agroecology processes.
- Local Knowledge: Participatory video for transmitting traditional knowledge on SSA.
- Income Generation: Mapping processing and commercialization experiences.
- Participatory Methods: Strengthening capacities on inclusive participation for food sovereignty
- Long-term Social Community Organization: Mapping the participants´ tools for strengthening community-based organizations at the various stages of engagement
CAN-affiliated researchers (at ECOSUR) involved in the Learning Community for Food Security and Sovereignty (CASSA) project published an article, "Bringing agroecology to scale: key drivers and emblematic cases," in the March issue of the journal Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. ABSTRACT: Agroecology as a transformative movement has gained momentum in many countries
Hoots of laughter made the Agroecology Treasure Hunt the loudest session at CASSA’s third Encuentro in April. Perhaps coincidentally, it was also the session with the most hands-on action outdoors. CAN affiliated researcher Bruce Ferguson, a professor at ECOSUR whose research is focused on mainstreaming agroecology, set up this session